Create an Account CourseStreet Log in  Connect with Facebook
Home Blog
 

UNIV 3539 Blog

A GROUP WEBLOG FOR THE PEOPLE'S CENTURY I UNIV 3539.

« return

November 27, 2007

Fallout


A New Era of World History: The Nuclear Age

According to the Brookings Institution, from 1940 to 1996, the United States spent $7 trillion (in 2006 dollars) on nuclear weapons . This represents only 29% of ALL U.S. military spending for the period. According to the Federal Bureau of the Public Debt, on November 23, 2007 the U.S. national debt stood at $9,130,889,561,057.31.

Cost aside, nuclear weapons also pose numerous other problems: long-term radioactive contamination and other ecological consequences, proliferation dangers, terrorism potential, Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), and brinksmanship to name a few. And yet, from its inception, the nuclear age has also tantalized us with "the peaceful atom" of nuclear reactors that would produce electricity "too cheap to meter." Nuclear medicine has opened new vistas for the medical profession.

For many ordinary people, the nuclear age evoked a fearful bravado?not unlike whistling past the graveyard?as forces seemingly beyond their control threatened annihilation at a moment's notice. The resultant wave of bomb and fallout shelters, "duck and cover" drills, and civil defense preparations were more psychological defenses against the unthinkable than reasonable, realistic, rational responses.

Nevertheless, since the apparent end of the Cold War in 1991, many insist that the very presence of a huge nuclear arsenal kept the peace for more than half a century?World War III did not follow World War II (at least not yet).

Given the unprecedented calamities of the world wars, has the nuclear age been a blessing or a curse? Is the verdict still to be determined? Do you feel safe or does the spectre of global thermonuclear war sometimes haunt you?
Posted by      William M. at 12:51 AM CST
displaying most recent comments (10 ommitted) | Comments (13)
  demia flowers  says:
I?m not sure if the nuclear age is curse or blessing. We are living in the times of great evils. I believe people are more corrupt and evil now than they were during the 1945s. Look at 9/11. Many people lost their lives as a result of the hatred against Americans. Who?s to say that they won?t return this time with a nuclear attack? It?s scary to think about and honestly I try not to think about it. Technology is advancing more and more everyday, not only in the United States, but in all countries around the world. Thinking about this, I?m almost leaning to this as being a curse. I?ve never really thought about it until now, but who?s to say that Japan won?t one day seek revenge for the many lives that they lost due to the bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. You never know what someone else is cooking up.
Posted on Thu, 6 Dec 2007 9:35 PM CST by demia f.
  Adam Nickas  says:
I think the future is yet to define the nuclear age as either a curse or a blessing. Althought the fear of being attacked by a nuclear weapon has subsided compared to previous generations, the threat still exists whether it is acknowledged or not. The fear of a nuclear attack can easily be reignited in a short amount of time as a result of increased conflict between the U.S. and a number of other nations. There's no telling where that increased threat will come from. We can only guess...
Posted on Fri, 7 Dec 2007 8:38 PM CST by Adam N.
  Lafonda Boyd  says:
I think so far it has been a blessing. If not for nuclear weapons we probably would have had WWIII by now, but no country is sure about what the next country has and don't want to take a chance. I feel that the nuclear war issue is alway a curent topic because you just never know what is going through people's mind's.
Posted on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:31 PM CST by Lafonda B.

November 18, 2007

Boomtime


Having grown up in the Great Depression and winning World War II, the ?Greatest Generation? turned decidedly domestic: a house in the suburbs, a new car or two, a ?nuclear? family. How did such simple postwar ambitions of ordinary people bring about the radical transformation of the American landscape (both physically and culturally)?
Posted by      William M. at 2:43 AM CST
displaying most recent comments (11 ommitted) | Comments (14)
  Lafonda Boyd  says:
I think that before the war people lived in the country because they where poor and did not have a choice. The people who did live in the city did so because they needed to find work and if they found work they had to stay in the city in order to be close to their job. Many people who moved to the suburbs did so to show that they did not have to live in the country because they where poor and that they did not have to live in the city to be close to work because they could afford to drive. I really feel that it was a status statement.
Posted on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 5:23 PM CST by Lafonda B.

November 13, 2007

Total War


When World War II in Europe came to an end on May 7, 1945, a new war was just beginning. This war became known as the Cold War and was between the two world superpowers, the United States (US) and the Soviet Union (USSR). The Cold War lasted from 1945 to 1991. Fears between the two nations, which started in World War I, and grew in World War II, caused the Cold War to break after the end of World War II. The conflict in the Cold War was the difference in politics between the US and the USSR. The United States was capitalist when the USSR was communist. Both nations started a nuclear arms race among each other. In other words, the Cold War was a war of tension and competition.

At the end of World War II, at the Yalta Conference, Germany was divided into 4 sections controlled by Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union and the United States. What marked the start of the Cold War was that there wasn?t an agreement on unifying Germany. The Allies were angry due to the free election promises given by Stalin at the Yalta Conference. The developed a foreign policy of containment to keep communism in the areas where it already was. In 1947, the Truman Doctrine was issued. It stated that America would help any non-communist country to resist communism. The United States also gave large amounts of money to help aid the non-commuist countries. This was known as the Marshall Plan. The Western Allies unified West Germany and the USSR reacted by putting a blockade on Berlin. The people in Berlin were starving from the lack of food. The United States arranged that all food and other items be airlifted to West Berlin. This is what is known as the Berlin Airlift. In 1946, Mao Zedong, a Communist leader, was in war with Jiang Jieshi, a nationalist leader. The civil war in China lasted until 1949. The communists came out victorious. This added to the Cold War.
Posted by      brent m. at 9:24 AM CST
  lerico mathis  says:
the total war was more of a competition, but as the U.S. did take part on more by helping other countries. We flew food over to Berlin when they didnt have any. We helping did destroying. we tried to help out the communist by giving sumts of money to them, but the communist still came out victorious
Posted on Wed, 5 Dec 2007 7:39 PM CST by lerico m.

Freedom Now


Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was one of the leading spiritual, political, moral, and cultural leaders of the 1900's. He helped free India from British control by using a unique method of nonviolent resistance. Gandhi is honored by the people of India, as the father of their nation. He was slight in build, but had great physical and moral strength. He was assassinated, by an Indian, who resented his program of tolerance for all creeds and religions.
Gandhi was born on Oct. 2, 1869, in Porbandar, India. His parents belonged to a Vaisya (merchant) caste of Hindus. Young Gandhi was a shy, serious boy. When he was 13 years old, he married Kasturba, a girl the same age. Their parents had arranged the marriage. Gandhi had four children. Gandhi studied law in London. He returned to India in 1891 to practice law, but he met with little success.
People in India called Gandhi the Mahatma (Great Soul). His life was guided by a search for truth. He believed truth could be known only through tolerance and concern for others and that finding a truthful way to solutions required constant testing. He called his autobiography My Experiments with Truth. Gandhi overcame fear and taught others to master fear.
He believed in nonviolence and taught that to be truly nonviolent required courage. He lived a simple life and thought it was wrong to kill animals for food or clothing. Gandhi developed a method of direct social action, based upon principles of courage, nonviolence, and truth, which he called Satyagraha. In this method, the way people behave is more important than what they achieve. Satyagraha was used to fight for India's independence and to bring about social change.
Posted by      brent m. at 9:22 AM CST
  lerico mathis  says:
it was a great thing that Ghandi did by helping people overcome their fears. he taught people how to catch animal for food or clothing. Ghandi was a strong knowing he had a great confidence in his work. all he was searching for was truth. true meanings to causes. Ghandi was a great wise man
Posted on Wed, 5 Dec 2007 7:43 PM CST by lerico m.

November 11, 2007

Freedom Now


Mohandas K. Gandhi is a very well known, wonderful man who made a great difference in the world, especially in the twenetieth century, and many/most people have great respect for him and his works. Gandhi's message of hope spurred a struggle for freedom that, in 1947, would lead to the birth of a nation -- and inspire the fight for independence on another continent half-a-world away.Freedom Now talks to the people who witnessed and participated in the fight for freedom in India and Africa. What emerges is a story of struggle, exhilaration -- and, more than occasionally, civil war. England was under imperial rule until Gandhi made a huge campaign of civil disobedience--he was fighting for their freedom. Another man who also preached civil disobedience like Gandhi did was Kwame Nkrumah, but when he was imprisoned Komla Gbedema took over.In 1951, in the face of growing unrest, the British acceded to demands for free elections and a national assembly. Nkrumah's party won a landslide victory. It was the beginning of the end of British rule in Africa. In 1957, the people of the Gold Coast became the first black Africans to achieve complete freedom.
To Africans, the Mau Mau were freedom fighters; to the Europeans, they were terrorists. By the late 1950s, it was becoming increasingly evident to British officials that they could hardly continue to protect their one percent of the population in the face of escalating African demands. Although Africa finally got their freedom in 25 countries over the British, French, and Belgians; there were new problems: Unity was difficult in new countries whose boundaries had been drawn to suit European convenience. Many tribes were forced to live on the wrong side of new borders -- in hostile territory. Takeover followed takeover in many countries. Most of the new governments were cruel and corrupt -- and for many Africans, one kind of repression was replaced by another. For most of Africa, the colonial legacy was a bitter one. New nations still had to convert their new autonomy into freedoms they'd hoped for, but had yet to win: freedom from hunger, poverty, political oppression.
Posted by      Ryan W. at 9:51 PM CST

November 10, 2007

cold war effects.


the cold war did have effects on colonies around the world. with the world powers busy with an arms race and trying to keep an eye on each other the colonies around the world where left alone to thrive on their own. In this time they were able to live they way that they wanted to and start building their land they way they wanted it without any interfering from world powers. now that many governments were pulling their people and resources out of colonies many had to find a way to stand on their own. this was not easy as many had conflicts.
Posted by      astin p. at 12:21 PM CST
  lerico mathis  says:
Cold War had a lot effects on todays society. things that i did nt have at the age of 9. kids at the age of nine have cell phones. its gettin out of control. twelve year old kids knowing how to drive. but it helped on good notes to. we have more people wanting to help out in the world by building more buildings have more entertainment so cold war had some good effects in todays society
Posted on Wed, 5 Dec 2007 7:46 PM CST by lerico m.

Freedom Now


Gandhi?s long struggle to liberate India from colonial rule reached fruition in the aftermath of World War II. Nonviolent civil disobedience appeared successful but within a year of India?s independence, Gandhi was assassinated. Today, celebrating fifty years of independence, India is a rising economic force, a nuclear power, and the world?s largest democracy.

In Africa, colonial rule was challenged more forcefully?notably the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya and the Algerian war against France. Although Britain (and especially the United States) believed that the Soviet Union was supplying the rebels, there is little evidence to support these Cold War fears.

In Egypt, however, Gamal Abdel Nasser exploited Cold War tensions to seize the Suez Canal from British and French control. Britain and France intervened militarily to recapture the canal but the U.S. forced a cessation of hostilities as the Soviets grew increasingly belligerent in their support of Nasser. To what extend did the Cold War affect the struggles for independence by colonials around the world? What other factors shaped the era of decolonization?
Posted by      William M. at 6:35 AM CST
displaying most recent comments (8 ommitted) | Comments (11)
  Cordelia Grayson  says:
During the Cold War, other smaller colonies pursued to create their own countries. Due to a lack in the financial area, this made it very difficult for them. There became a pursuit of power among these smaller colonies, which caused many problems. They pushed to establish freedom and democracies, but they did not have the financial resources to do so. Not having the support from larger nations affected them greatly.
Posted on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:28 PM CST by Cordelia G.
  Allison Swan  says:
The Cold War certainly had some effects on the decolonization process that took place in Africa. Many of the nations adopted a socialist form of government after gaining independence from western European nations such as Britain and France. With these two nations being embroiled in a Cold War with the U.S.S.R., the very representation of the socialist government, it does raise some questions that many of the new nations adopted this form of government. Whether uprisings were caused by Soviet-supplied rebels, I don't know, but the conflict had to have affected the African nations as it did countries all over the world at that time.
I do think that the main thing driving the call for independence was the mere fact that Africans desired freedom. The soldiers who went to fight for the European nations were exposed to other things, and were able to see the manner in which India was fighting for its independence from Britain. This inspired many people, and they finally decided to do something about it.
Posted on Mon, 3 Dec 2007 1:55 PM CST by Allison S.
  lerico mathis  says:
The Cold War had effects on the the decolonization process that took place in Africa.In British-ruled African nations, the U.S. was not wiling to go against their best ally. It seems that some of the nations were not quite ready to have complete control of the government since many still have unrest and dictators ruling.
Posted on Wed, 5 Dec 2007 7:35 PM CST by lerico m.

November 3, 2007

the cold war


There is no way that the United States could have wiped out communism. despite their best efforts in the cold war their crusade for democracy failed. The Cold War lasted nearly 50 years and put the United States no closer to their goal at the end of it. The cold war was better than world war III and better option. although peace would have been the best option as many other countries suffed and still suffer from the side effects of the cold war. the cold war mass produced weapons which is where all terrorist weapons come from.
Posted by      astin p. at 3:33 PM CDT

Brave New World


With a blinding flash the world entered the nuclear age in 1945, bringing to an end the greatest calamity in human history. In the aftermath of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the speculation grew (and continues today) that the A-bombs had been used?at least in part?to demonstrate American strength and resolution to the Soviet Union. The devil?s bargain of alliance with Stalin had rapidly degenerated as Nazi defenses collapsed. The seeds of the Cold War were sown well before VE-Day.

The postwar division of Europe was inevitable given the fact of Soviet military occupation. Unless the U.S. (and other Allies) went to war with the U.S.S.R. to liberate eastern Europe, Soviet control was a fait accompli. Postwar tensions (e.g. the communist revolution in Greece) quickly led to the development of the Truman Doctrine?the U.S. would seek to ?contain? the expansion of the Soviet empire by all means short of total war.

In Europe, the Iron Curtain (in Churchill?s eloquent description) would be the trip line for total war?hostilities between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. would rapidly escalate beyond diplomacy unless cool heads prevailed. When the Berlin crisis occurred in 1948, the U.S. monopoly on nuclear weapons undoubtedly deterred further Soviet aggression. Within a year, the monopoly ended and the nuclear arms race began. The arsenal of megadeath still stands poised for World War III.

Should (could) the western allies have freed eastern Europe from communism in 1945? Was Cold War a better choice (more cost effective, less deadly, etc.)?
Posted by      William M. at 7:34 AM CDT
displaying most recent comments (8 ommitted) | Comments (11)
  Lindsey Crosby  says:
I think the US made a great chose on the Cold War instead of an all out war. During this time the US was already trying to rebuild its economy from WWII. Even though we had to pay a lot more for the cold war, at least our families weren't shipped over seas agian and being killled. I don't think we could have mentally been able to fight another war.
Posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 5:13 PM CST by Lindsey C.
  Cordelia Grayson  says:
The western allies could not have freed eastern Europe from communism at all. The United States had already lost so much during World War II. Since the advancement to nuclear weapons, it would have been devastating to engage in another world war. Therefore, I feel that it was very beneficial that the United States and the Soviet Union did not engage in a global war. We would probably still be recovering as we speak. The Cold War was very expensive, but it may have cost a lot more in the global war.
Posted on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:03 PM CST by Cordelia G.
  Allison Swan  says:
Ideally, the western Allies should have intervened more than they did. The United States represents a freedom, and in this case, that freedom would be for those countries to be able to select their own forms of governments. The way it went, communism was forced on the people in much the same way that Hitler forced his ideas on the people of Poland and the other countries he invaded.
However, it can be seen why the western nations did not speak up. The costs, both in terms of finances and human lives, of another World War could not be risked. The world would never recover from it, and that is probably a main reason the western countries did nothing.
Posted on Sun, 2 Dec 2007 4:49 PM CST by Allison S.




 Copyright © 2007-2016 William E. Maxwell. All rights reserved.